Liability of Successor Corporation/De Facto Merger

Source:Law Article         Published:2010-02-07         Access:585
Generally, Florida law does not impose the liabilities of a predecessor corporation on a successor corporation unless:
1. The successor expressly or impliedly assumes obligations of the predecessor;
2. The transaction is a de facto merger;
3. The successor is a mere continuation of the predecessor; or
4. The transaction is a fraudulent effort to avoid the liabilities of the predecessor.
The case of Laboratory Corporation of America v. Professional Recovery Network ETC provides an excellent review of this area of law. In that case, a company owned exclusively by one shareholder, officer and director ran up a sizable debt in the amount of $500,000. Once the creditor demanded payment the owner discarded the corporation. He started a new corporate entity wherein he remained the sole shareholder, officer and director. The new entity engaged in the same business, had the same customers, the same employees and same telephone, fax numbers, accounting system and computerized database as the prior corporation.
The court made short shrift of this obvious effort to defraud creditors.
In determining whether or not a new corporate entity is part of a fraudulent scheme to avoid liabilities the court adopts several tests.
First, the court will examine whether or not reasonable value has been paid for assets that are transferred to the new corporation.
Second, the court will examine whether a de facto merger occurred wherein one corporation was merely absorbed by another (i.e. there is a continuity of the selling corporation evidenced by such things as the same management, personnel, assets, location, stockholders, customers, employees and location of operations).
By adopting these simple tests the court determines whether fraudulent intent exists to avoid payment to creditors.
Abandoning one corporation on Friday and starting a new corporation continuing the same business on the following Monday will most likely be determined a sham. Creditors should not be discouraged by such transparent maneuverings.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Houston E. Short
Houston Short grew up in the Central Florida area, and continues to reside in Orlando with his family. He provides representation in arbitration actions for the American Arbitration Association and engages in alternative dispute resolutions including mediation both binding and non-binding arbitration, and settlement negotiations. He is an active member of the American Arbitration Association Panel Review Committee, the Orange County Bar Association, and the Florida Bar. He graduated from Florida State University in 1984 with a bachelors of science degree (cum laude) and received his juris doctor from the University of Florida in 1987 (with honors). Houston co-authored, "The Constitutionality of the Legislatures Mandate to Sever Counterclaims in Mortgage Foreclosure Action," the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section, The Florida Bar.
  Relatedmore>> 
03-21
03-09
03-08
03-07
03-07
02-17
02-16
02-15
02-14

长沙典当行  怀孕初期症状  特码  スーパーコピー時  時計 ブランド  美酒团  最新上映电影  1.76天下毁灭传奇  卡纸雕花模具  爱马仕包包  搞笑视频  手链  birkenstock womens shoes  Franklin Marshall Hoodies  the north face jackets  the north face outlet  asics onitsuka tiger shoes  Babyliss Pro  tory burch handbags  传奇私服  传奇私服  新开传奇私服  Rosetta Stone language  Belstaff Leather Jackets  Onitsuka Tiger Shoes  Nike Air Max Shoes  true religion jeans  Moncler Outlet  Moncler Jackets  Belstaff Jackets  Hogan Shoes  Australian Ugg Boots  Ghd Hair Straighteners  Ugg Boots 5815  Beats By Dr Dre  ASICS Shoes  Franklin Marshall T-shirts  Tods shoes  Christian Louboutin Pumps  Tods shoes  cole haan outlet  钻石  合肥招聘网  创意礼品批发  乐器信息网  成都装修队  香港六合彩   优衣库女装  苏州租房网  东莞租房网  投影机导购  运动鞋  昆山租房网  传奇私发服  皇冠足球开户网  
Copyright 2007 Lycomlawyer.Com, All Rights Reserved

Sitemap