How Law Protects Leave Pay

Source:Law Article         Published:2010-03-08         Access:952
It provides that employees who work 24 hours or more per month are entitled to a minimum of 21 consecutive days for each annual leave cycle.
Annual leave cycle is defined as a period of 12 months employment with the same employer immediately following an employee's commencement of employment or completion of his or her previous legal cycle.
As stated above, annual leave must be on full pay, calculated at the rate applicable immediately before the beginning of the period of leave.
Annual leave might, however, not be taken during the period of other forms of leave or during the period of notice of termination of employment.
Where a public holiday falls on a day during the employee's annual leave, where the employee would ordinarily have worked on that day, the employer must grant such employee an additional day of paid leave.
Annual leave must be taken subject to an agreement between the employer and the employee, failing which the employer may determine when leave is to be taken.
On termination of employment, an employer must, among others, pay to an employee, remuneration for any period of annual leave due that the employee has not taken.
The determination of "leave due" and accordingly warranting payment (on termination of employment) has become one of the highly debated issues.
The debate centres mainly on the question whether leave not taken by the employee during a leave cycle accrues to the employee or whether it is forfeited.
A key provision in the act dealing with this issue is found in section 20(4), which provides that an employer must grant annual leave not later than six months after the end of the annual leave cycle.
The interpretation of this section by the labour court has intensified the debate around this issue, with two labour court judgments coming to two different decisions.
The labour court decisions are Jardine v Tongaat-Hulett Sugar and Jooste v Kohler Packaging.
The labour court in Jardine v Tongaat-Hulett Sugar held that section 20(4) of the act existed for the protection of employees who might otherwise be denied annual leave.
So, leave not taken within six months after the end of the leave cycle is not forfeited.
In contrast, the labour court held in Jooste v Kohler Packaging that the very purpose of the act is to ensure that an employee takes annual leave.
The court accordingly held that payment will only be made in respect of leave accrued in the cycle immediately preceding that during which the termination takes place.
In the event that an employee fails to take annual leave within six months after the end of the annual leave cycle, such leave will be forfeited and the employee will not receive payment for such leave days upon termination of his employment.
The employer and employees are not allowed to contract out of the main provisions of the act - such as the granting of the minimum period of annual leave.
They may, however, regulate the employee's leave entitlement in excess of the minimum 21 days provided in the act.
The employer may not refuse the employee annual leave entitlement.
In the event that the employer refuses the employee such entitlement, the employee may refer such matter to the Department of Labour.
Having regard to the remedies available to the employee and the purpose of the act, the labour court's decision in Kohler Packaging seems well reasoned and preferable, as it will ensure that employees exercise their rights and take annual leave.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Lavery Modise & Lebogang Kutumela
Lavery Modise is deputy chairman of Eversheds, South Africa and heads up the firms employment law department. He is one of the top labour lawyers in the country, who has represented trade unions and several large employers. As a litigation attorney, he has represented clients in all South African courts up to the Supreme Court of Appeals. He acts as arbitrator and mediator in labour related matters and has also acted as a judge of the Labour Court from time to time. At present he is the chairperson of the General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council.
Lebogang Kutumela is an associate at Eversheds, South Africa. He specialises in employment and labour law.
  Relatedmore>> 
03-07
03-07
03-09
03-07
03-06
03-05
03-05
03-04
03-03

长沙典当行  怀孕初期症状  特码  スーパーコピー時  時計 ブランド  美酒团  最新上映电影  1.76天下毁灭传奇  卡纸雕花模具  爱马仕包包  搞笑视频  手链  birkenstock womens shoes  Franklin Marshall Hoodies  the north face jackets  the north face outlet  asics onitsuka tiger shoes  Babyliss Pro  tory burch handbags  传奇私服  传奇私服  新开传奇私服  Rosetta Stone language  Belstaff Leather Jackets  Onitsuka Tiger Shoes  Nike Air Max Shoes  true religion jeans  Moncler Outlet  Moncler Jackets  Belstaff Jackets  Hogan Shoes  Australian Ugg Boots  Ghd Hair Straighteners  Ugg Boots 5815  Beats By Dr Dre  ASICS Shoes  Franklin Marshall T-shirts  Tods shoes  Christian Louboutin Pumps  Tods shoes  cole haan outlet  钻石  合肥招聘网  创意礼品批发  乐器信息网  成都装修队  香港六合彩   优衣库女装  苏州租房网  东莞租房网  投影机导购  运动鞋  昆山租房网  传奇私发服  皇冠足球开户网  
Copyright 2007 Lycomlawyer.Com, All Rights Reserved

Sitemap