Debt Buybacks: HMRC to Introduce Anti-Avoidance Measures - UK

Source:Law Article         Published:2010-01-13         Access:509
HMRC announced on 15 October 2009 that anti-avoidance legislation will be included in the next Financial Bill, but which will have retrospective effect from 15 October 2009, and which affects debt buybacks.
This will have a direct impact on the situation where a company which owes money to an arm's length lender (e.g. a bank) wants to write off or write down that debt, as does the bank.
Current Position
The general position is that unless the parties are connected, or there is some sort of insolvency arrangement, or there is a debt/equity swap etc, the write off or write down of the debt will generate a taxable credit in the borrower, and a tax deduction in the lender.
Previously, in order to maintain the taxable deduction for the lender yet avoid the taxable credit for the borrower, the borrower company could set up a subsidiary company which would buy the debt in from the lender for 1. Since this was an arm's length transaction, the lender would get its tax write down.
The subsidiary company would then release its parent from its debt, and because that happened between connected parties, there was no taxable credit in the original borrower (but no corresponding write down in the subsidiary company (i.e. the new lender)).
Anti-avoidance legislation was introduced a few years ago which impacted on this scenario, but the above provisions still applied provided that the acquisition of the debt from the lender was at arm's length and the subsidiary company was not connected to the parent at any time during a 3 year period ending 12 months before the debt buy in. Therefore, if a new company was established which bought on arm's length terms, this was fine.
It is this situation that will now be fundamentally changed.
HMRC Proposals
There are two proposals. The first is that instead of the criterion that the purchasing company must not have been connected to its parent at any time during the 3 year period ending 12 months before the buy in, there are three new conditions which must be met.
These are:
(a) there must have been a change in ownership of the debtor (i.e parent company) in the period of 12 months before the debt purchase (by subsidiary company);
(b) the debt purchase must have been intrinsic to the change of ownership; and
(c) before the change of ownership the debtor must have been suffering severe financial problems.
If these criteria are not met, then the anti-avoidance provisions will apply, and there is in effect a tax hit on the subsidiary company when it acquires the debt.
This of itself will severely curtail the strategy. However there is a second provision which will also make such arrangements unattractive.
This second provision bites if the debt is bought in by the subsidiary company (the group having met the conditions mentioned above), but then the debt is released. As mentioned above, in normal circumstances, this will be treated as tax neutral (i.e. no tax hit on the original borrower but no tax deduction in the subsidiary company creditor). However, this second provision suggests (it is not very clear from the press release) that in these circumstances it will not be tax neutral and the parent company, being released from the debt, will be taxed on the amount released. In other words it will be treated as if it were released by an arm's length lender. In these circumstances, there is no suggestion that the subsidiary company will get a tax deductible write down (i.e. there is no symmetry).
It is important to note, however, that the other ways of ensuring that there is asymmetry when debt is written off (for example debt equity swaps etc) are still available.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Nigel Popplewell
We provide legal advice to national and international clients, individuals and organizations, across a range of practice areas and industry sectors. We build long term relationships with our clients, ensuring that they gain maximum benefit from working with us. We have a dedicated Client Relationship Management team to make sure we listen to our clients and deliver what they want.
  Relatedmore>> 
02-02
01-25
01-19
01-15
01-14
01-07
01-06
01-05
12-31

长沙典当行  怀孕初期症状  特码  スーパーコピー時  時計 ブランド  美酒团  最新上映电影  1.76天下毁灭传奇  卡纸雕花模具  爱马仕包包  搞笑视频  手链  birkenstock womens shoes  Franklin Marshall Hoodies  the north face jackets  the north face outlet  asics onitsuka tiger shoes  Babyliss Pro  tory burch handbags  传奇私服  传奇私服  新开传奇私服  Rosetta Stone language  Belstaff Leather Jackets  Onitsuka Tiger Shoes  Nike Air Max Shoes  true religion jeans  Moncler Outlet  Moncler Jackets  Belstaff Jackets  Hogan Shoes  Australian Ugg Boots  Ghd Hair Straighteners  Ugg Boots 5815  Beats By Dr Dre  ASICS Shoes  Franklin Marshall T-shirts  Tods shoes  Christian Louboutin Pumps  Tods shoes  cole haan outlet  钻石  合肥招聘网  创意礼品批发  乐器信息网  成都装修队  香港六合彩   优衣库女装  苏州租房网  东莞租房网  投影机导购  运动鞋  昆山租房网  传奇私发服  皇冠足球开户网  
Copyright 2007 Lycomlawyer.Com, All Rights Reserved

Sitemap