You Have Obtained a Final Judgment: Now What?

Source:Law Article         Published:2010-02-27         Access:785
I recently attended a hearing where a plaintiff was acting pro se (without the services of an attorney) and the judge awarded her a final judgment. She looked across the table and asked the defendant when she could expect his check. The defendant leered back across the table and merely laughed.
The plaintiff was extremely confused and frustrated. She left the hearing and I doubt she ever made any collection efforts. The final judgment she received that day was merely a piece of paper suitable for framing.
The collection process can be challenging. Occasionally, a defendant will offer to pay the final judgment or a portion thereof in order to obtain a full release or satisfaction of the final judgment.
However, more often than not, a defendant will refuse to pay. In this circumstance a certified copy of the final judgment should be recorded in each county wherein the defendant may own real property.
Furthermore, a judgment lien certificate should be filed in Tallahassee in accordance with 55.203 of the Florida Statutes. The judgment lien certificate, once filed, will provide notice and establish priority with regard to the debtors personal property. The judgment lien certificate is required to be filed before a party may instruct the sheriff to pick up personal property owned by the defendant and have same sold.
The most effective tool in order to collect a judgment is a garnishment to freeze a bank account. A garnishment procedure is invoked by filing the necessary forms with the clerk of the court which identify a bank or third party who may have in its possession monies owed to the defendant. The garnishment procedure is found in Chapter 77 of the Florida Statutes.
Once a garnishment is served upon a bank or third party the monies in the account are frozen pending notice to the defendant and an opportunity to dispute the seizure of funds.
The garnishment procedure is the best way to obtain payment because it is the least expensive method and simplest procedure.
The garnishment procedure is extremely effective in collecting judgments against corporations. The corporation may have several accounts receivable that will be paid in a 30-60 day timeframe. Serving the garnishment upon the customers of a corporation will intercept these monies. A judgment against an individual is more problematic.
An individual may be the head of household which severely restricts the percentage of the paycheck that can be garnished. Moreover, if the individual earns less than an established threshold, no garnishment can be obtained.
A plaintiff is also restricted as to the assets that are available to pay the judgment. For example, a judgment against a husband will not encumber assets, bank accounts or personal property owned by husband and wife. A judgment against one spouse generally does not encumber marital property.
A plaintiffs efforts to obtain payment are often stymied by bankruptcy, homestead exemptions, head of household exemptions, marital asset exemptions as well as competing claims of other creditors.
A party would be wise to investigate the assets of a target prior to initiating litigation in order to assess the opportunities for collection. Otherwise you too could receive a paper judgment with no monetary value.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Houston E. Short
Houston Short grew up in the Central Florida area, and continues to reside in Orlando with his family. He provides representation in arbitration actions for the American Arbitration Association and engages in alternative dispute resolutions including mediation both binding and non-binding arbitration, and settlement negotiations. He is an active member of the American Arbitration Association Panel Review Committee, the Orange County Bar Association, and the Florida Bar. He graduated from Florida State University in 1984 with a bachelors of science degree (cum laude) and received his juris doctor from the University of Florida in 1987 (with honors). Houston co-authored, "The Constitutionality of the Legislatures Mandate to Sever Counterclaims in Mortgage Foreclosure Action," the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section, The Florida Bar.
  Relatedmore>> 
03-07
03-02
03-01
02-28
02-26
02-25
02-24
02-23
02-22

长沙典当行  怀孕初期症状  特码  スーパーコピー時  時計 ブランド  美酒团  最新上映电影  1.76天下毁灭传奇  卡纸雕花模具  爱马仕包包  搞笑视频  手链  birkenstock womens shoes  Franklin Marshall Hoodies  the north face jackets  the north face outlet  asics onitsuka tiger shoes  Babyliss Pro  tory burch handbags  传奇私服  传奇私服  新开传奇私服  Rosetta Stone language  Belstaff Leather Jackets  Onitsuka Tiger Shoes  Nike Air Max Shoes  true religion jeans  Moncler Outlet  Moncler Jackets  Belstaff Jackets  Hogan Shoes  Australian Ugg Boots  Ghd Hair Straighteners  Ugg Boots 5815  Beats By Dr Dre  ASICS Shoes  Franklin Marshall T-shirts  Tods shoes  Christian Louboutin Pumps  Tods shoes  cole haan outlet  钻石  合肥招聘网  创意礼品批发  乐器信息网  成都装修队  香港六合彩   优衣库女装  苏州租房网  东莞租房网  投影机导购  运动鞋  昆山租房网  传奇私发服  皇冠足球开户网  
Copyright 2007 Lycomlawyer.Com, All Rights Reserved

Sitemap